On Wed, 2012-10-31 at 10:40 -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Phil Blundell <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, 2012-10-31 at 10:29 -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote: > >> Well, I cannot ask for a pool zone for OE or Yocto; it'd be good but > >> it is not yet done and I prefer to have it merged and changed once it > >> happens. > > > > The obvious problem with that approach is that "it" may never happen > > (especially if you're relying on some as-yet-unidentified third party to > > do the work) and, even if it does, arbitrarily many people might ship > > the broken configuration in the meantime. Merging a change that we know > > is wrong seems like a bad plan. > > It is better then a broken .service file IMO ;-)
Well, I guess that's where we disagree. Can you elaborate on why having no default NTP server in the metadata is such a crisis, and why none of the other options I mentioned before is a suitable way to deal with the problem? p. _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
