On Thursday 01 November 2012 09:42:46 Xin Ouyang wrote: > Also fix license, summary and patches. > > Signed-off-by: Xin Ouyang <[email protected]>
These two patches should really be squashed into one - this is the convention we've established for importing recipes from OE-Classic (as long as "Import from OE-Classic" or similar is mentioned somewhere in the commit message). > --- a/meta-networking/recipes-support/netperf/netperf_2.4.4.bb > +++ b/meta-networking/recipes-support/netperf/netperf_2.6.0.bb > @@ -1,14 +1,19 @@ > -DESCRIPTION="Network performance benchmark including tests for TCP, UDP, > sockets, ATM and more." > +SUMMARY = "A networking benchmarking tool" > +DESCRIPTION = "Network performance benchmark including tests for TCP, UDP, > sockets, ATM and more." > SECTION = "console/network" > HOMEPAGE = "http://www.netperf.org/"; > -LICENSE = "netperf" > -PR = "r3" > +LICENSE = "HP" There's no standard license known as "HP" so "netperf" for LICENSE is correct - it means it's a license specific to the netperf software package. > +LICENSE_FLAGS = "commercial" Good point - I think many would miss the non-commercial use only clause in the license otherwise. > +SRC_URI[md5sum] = "9654ffdfd4c4f2c93ce3733cd9ed9236" > +SRC_URI[sha256sum] = > "cd8dac710d4273d29f70e8dbd09353a6362ac58a11926e0822233c0cb230323a" I think we prefer to put these next to SRC_URI these days (or at least I do). Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
