> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Martin Jansa > Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 6:50 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [oe] MACHINE_KERNEL_PR vs recipe PR > > On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 06:20:25AM -0500, Ian Geiser wrote: > > I am curious about the machine_kerne_pr class. What is the [...snip...] > > OEBasicHash was only rebuilding external modules, but that does not > upgrade them on target device. > > Now with PR service it's not so important, but still useful because > it's more reliable. Okay, that makes sense. For consistency's sake is there a best practices here? Or is it left up to the preference of the kernel recipe maintainer? Thanks!
_______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
