On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 07:32:33PM +0000, Paul Eggleton wrote: > On Tuesday 12 February 2013 20:19:02 Martin Jansa wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 05:09:01PM +0000, Paul Eggleton wrote: > > > * tslib: OE-Core has the 1.0 release version, meta-oe has a git recipe > > > that is ahead of 1.0; the OE-Core version has two patches not in the > > > meta-oe version but that both have been merged upstream in the git > > > revision being used in the meta-oe version. There is no newer stable > > > release. What do we do here? Should we ask upstream (Chris) for a new > > > stable release? > > > > tslib is also requested on devices where kernel driver returns too much > > noise, tslib can filter that, evdev needs separate filter like > > http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~metan/evfilter/ > > but that isn't integrated in OE. > > OK. I think the best course of action is to petition upstream for a stable > release and then update OE-Core to that, then we can drop the recipe from > meta-oe without ill effect.
Agreed, > > > * xserver-nodm-init: the two versions are quite distinct. Not sure I > > > understand the full history here but perhaps someone else can fill in the > > > blanks...? > > > > The biggest difference is integrated xinput-calibrator and use of > > xserver-common_1.34.bb > > So can you see a means for us to move this into OE-Core? Where are the points > of conflict? xinput-calibrator is now being reworked by Andreas so we should at least wait for this rework to settle down and xserver-common is similar to formfactor, a bit more flexible but a lot worse to maintain for new MACHINES (FWIW all local patches are waiting in florian mbox). -- Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
