On 02/13/2013 10:34 PM, Joe MacDonald wrote:
[[meta-networking][PATCH 1/3] traceroute: resolve multilib issues] On 13.02.11
(Mon 13:16) Aws Ismail wrote:
Make recipe changes to enable successfull building
when multilib is being used.
Signed-off-by: Aws Ismail <[email protected]>
---
.../traceroute/traceroute_2.0.18.bb | 8 +++++---
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta-networking/recipes-support/traceroute/traceroute_2.0.18.bb
b/meta-networking/recipes-support/traceroute/traceroute_2.0.18.bb
index 6eca731..f5f96b2 100644
--- a/meta-networking/recipes-support/traceroute/traceroute_2.0.18.bb
+++ b/meta-networking/recipes-support/traceroute/traceroute_2.0.18.bb
@@ -11,6 +11,8 @@ LICENSE = "GPL-2.0 LGPL-2.1"
LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=94d55d512a9ba36caa9b7df079bae19f \
file://COPYING.LIB;md5=bbb461211a33b134d42ed5ee802b37ff"
+PR = "r1"
+
inherit update-alternatives
SRC_URI = "${SOURCEFORGE_MIRROR}/traceroute/traceroute/traceroute-2.0.18/traceroute-2.0.18.tar.gz \
@@ -26,13 +28,13 @@ do_compile() {
do_install() {
install -d ${D}${bindir}
- install -m755 ${PN}/${PN} ${D}${bindir}
+ install -m755 ${BPN}/${BPN} ${D}${bindir}
install -m755 wrappers/tcptraceroute ${D}${bindir}
install -d ${D}${mandir}
- install -p -m644 ${PN}/${PN}.8 ${D}${mandir}
- ln -s ${PN}.8 ${D}${mandir}/${PN}6.8
+ install -p -m644 ${BPN}/${BPN}.8 ${D}${mandir}
+ ln -s ${PN}.8 ${D}${mandir}/${BPN}6.8
ln -s ${PN}.8 ${D}${mandir}/tcptraceroute.8
Are the targets actually installed as ${PN}.8 and not ${BPN}.8 in a
multilib build scenario? What I'm asking is should the above be changed
to this instead:
ln -s ${BPN}.8 ${D}${mandir}/${BPN}6.8
ln -s ${BPN}.8 ${D}${mandir}/tcptraceroute.8
I think you're right. It should be like that but the odd
thing is that even with ln -s ${PN}.8 no errors were
seen.
Aws\
--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
