On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 10:01 PM, Martin Jansa <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 11:59:07PM +0100, Martin Jansa wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 11:50:41PM +0100, Andreas Müller wrote: >> > On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 11:18 PM, Martin Jansa <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> > > On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 09:25:34AM -0800, Khem Raj wrote: >> > >> Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <[email protected]> >> > > >> > > good old meta-systemd should now parse again, >> > Thanks - will come back to test HEADs soon. >> >> But be aware that I've fixed only parsing of avahi and wpa-supplicant. >> >> I haven't tested it properly in runtime because my upgrade path is a bit >> broken (because I was building images with khem's patches for a while to >> test other stuff) and even clean build with failed to boot with >> qemux86-64 and I don't have time to debug it now. >> >> > > I wont apply this 2 commits >> > > until systemd discussion in oe-core is finished and future of >> > > meta-systemd decided. >> > > >> > After systemd regression is worked around yocto 1.4 release regression >> > is knocking at the door... >> >> yes :/ >> >> If we need to maintain meta-systemd bbappends for upgrade path we can >> also maintain them with PN-systemd packages and good old systemd bbclass. > > Khem pinged me about this patch, so here are my thoughts: > > PN-systemd discussion in oe-core haven't moved a bit since this patch > was proposed, I think we have 2-3 options, lets vote about meta-systemd > future. > > 1) keep PN-systemd separation in meta-systemd and fixup .bbappends to > resolve issues created by oe-core (I've fixed some issues, but still a > lot of issues in postinst/postrm/prerm scripts when both inits are > sharing the same PN) > > 2) give up on clean separation of PN-<init> and provide upgrade path > from PN-systemd to PN (mostly done by these 2 commits from khem). > > 3) give up on clean separation of PN-<init> and upgrade path (there are > many issues in other parts of oe-core, so upgrade path from danny to > dylan doesn't look usable. > > A) migrate existing .bbappends to their recipes to .bb files and > remove this layer. Any volunteer for that? > > My vote: 3) + A) later in 1.5 > I guess we're all too busy to implement 1), upgrade path would be nice, > but is all-or-nothing, doesn't make much sense to spend a lot of time > fixing every issue from PN-systemd when there are issues from other > recipes we're not going to fix by .bbappends in meta-oe. > > Vote required from Khem, Koen, Andreas, Enrico, Otavio > Vote welcome from other meta-systemd contributors > tend also to 3) + A) but I would prefer to have it as one transaction. Otherwise we might face another upgrade path breakage. I know this will cause questions as who and when...
Andreas _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
