On Sunday 14 April 2013 17:04:23 Martin Jansa wrote: > On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 04:01:59PM +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote: > > On Sunday 14 April 2013 15:49:34 Martin Jansa wrote: > > > * they conflict in sysroot anyway, should be converted to PACKAGECONFIG > > > > > > but because dbus is already built in most images I'll let it for > > > someone > > > who has such use-case > > > > Hang on a sec, I agree it's good to get rid of this second recipe, but > > you're changing the default - so at least give people a way to influence > > it. It's not too hard to put in PACKAGECONFIG now while you're changing > > the recipe anyway. > > is there someone who needs dnsmasq without dbus?
It's not too hard to imagine a minimal system that wants one and not the other. We had two recipes originally for a reason. Sure, it's fine if you're already using something that uses dbus and therefore you'll have it anyway, but not everyone is in the same situation. Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
