On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 03:11:11PM +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote: > On Tuesday 16 April 2013 16:05:01 Martin Jansa wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 02:46:48PM +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote: > > > In case you're wondering why I've only sent the cover letter for just two > > > patches, I tried sending them as normal and what I got was: > > > > > > fatal: pull-29844/0001-hicolor-icon-theme-remove.patch: 29: patch contains > > > a line longer than 998 characters warning: no patches were sent > > > > > > They are just deletes though so they don't contain much in the way of > > > substance. > > > > libical is fine and I'll merge it shortly, but hicolor-icon-theme needs > > PR bump in oe-core first (and in oe-core/dylan if you want it merged in > > meta-oe before branching dylan). > > If you'll accept an OE-Core PR bump for this can we do the same for the > bbappends that are preserved solely for keeping the same PR?
bbappens are a bit different, because this PR bump (would be nice to do +2) does not need to happen atomically with meta-oe bb removal. With bbappends it's possible that someone will upgrade oe-core with PR bumps, build qt4-x11-free and then upgrade meta-oe without PRINCs and build qt4-x11-free. But I'm willing to take that risk if we apply both "close" :). -- Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
