On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:33:13AM +0200, Eric Bénard wrote: > Le Tue, 28 May 2013 11:30:13 +0200, > Martin Jansa <[email protected]> a écrit : > > > On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:27:24AM +0200, Eric Bénard wrote: > > > Le Tue, 28 May 2013 11:25:18 +0200, > > > Martin Jansa <[email protected]> a écrit : > > > > On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 10:50:56AM +0200, Eric Bénard wrote: > > > > > true do you want a v2 ? > > > > > > > > No, I've already added it and merged it :) > > > > > > > perfect. > > > > > > > Normally I would take longer for testing it, but I know about other > > > > people starting to work on 5.0.2 so I wanted them to start with your > > > > fixes included. > > > > > > > FWIW all my tests were done with you patch > > > e7a477a171bf0560939196eb7ebe8e0b05061072 applied so maybe it's > > > interesting to also apply it. > > > > But that will require to abandon 5.0.0 and 5.0.1, well I can at least > > update that pull request to remove 5.0.0 and 5.0.1 together with this > > SRCREV bump. > > > maybe you can create a dylan branch with 5.0.0 and 5.0.1 and switch > master to 5.0.2 ?
Sounds good, will do Btw is this patch backport of commit bb4e2e4faf76d4b2992231891a9d640cfdac5196 Author: Michael Brasser <[email protected]> Date: Tue Mar 26 09:22:51 2013 -0500 Allow tslib to be specified at configure time. ? I'm forward porting patches needed for qtbase_git and this one seems to be resolved in upstream. -- Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
