On Tuesday 16 July 2013 17:36:08 Samuel Stirtzel wrote: > 2013/7/13 Paul Eggleton <[email protected]>: > > * Add proper SUMMARY > > * Break long DESCRIPTION onto multiple lines > > * Reorder some lines > > > > Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <[email protected]> > > --- > > > > meta-oe/recipes-devtools/protobuf/protobuf_2.4.1.bb | 20 > > ++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+) > > create mode 100644 meta-oe/recipes-devtools/protobuf/protobuf_2.4.1.bb > > > > diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-devtools/protobuf/protobuf_2.4.1.bb > > b/meta-oe/recipes-devtools/protobuf/protobuf_2.4.1.bb new file mode > > 100644 > > index 0000000..c4ed5e6 > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/meta-oe/recipes-devtools/protobuf/protobuf_2.4.1.bb > > @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@ > > +SUMMARY = "Protocol Buffers - structured data serialisation mechanism" > > +DESCRIPTION = "Protocol Buffers are a way of encoding structured data in > > an \ +efficient yet extensible format. Google uses Protocol Buffers for > > almost \ +all of its internal RPC protocols and file formats." > > +HOMEPAGE = "http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/"; > > +SECTION = "console/tools" > > +LICENSE = "BSD-3-Clause" > > + > > +LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = > > "file://COPYING.txt;md5=af6809583bfde9a31595a58bb4a24514" + > > +SRC_URI = "http://protobuf.googlecode.com/files/protobuf-${PV}.tar.gz"; > > + > > +SRC_URI[md5sum] = "dc84e9912ea768baa1976cb7bbcea7b5" > > +SRC_URI[sha256sum] = > > "eac6969b617f397247e805267da2b0db3ff9e5a9163b123503a192fbb5776567" + > > +EXTRA_OECONF += " --with-protoc=echo" > > Hi, > > do you know why it doesn't use: > > EXTRA_OECONF += "--with-protoc=${STAGING_BINDIR_NATIVE}/protoc" > > in combination with DEPENDS += "protobuf-native" in protobuf? > Instead the recipe that uses protobuf/protoc depends on protobuf and > protobuf-native. > > My assumption is, that the result would the same, and it is currently > skipping tests for the cross compiled protobuf. > Or does it archive anything else?
I'm not sure, this bit came from the original protobuf recipe in meta- virtualization. David, you seem to have written this recipe originally, do you have any insight into the above? Thanks, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
