On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 10:56 AM, Hongxu Jia <[email protected]> wrote: > On 08/20/2013 04:36 PM, Burton, Ross wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> On 19 August 2013 02:34, Hongxu Jia <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> gitpkgv.bbclass is in meta-oe. >>> >> Is this the only part of meta-oe that meta-filesystems needs? If it's >> genuinely useful should we this be considered for oe-core? > > I am afraid not, libimobiledevice and samba are in meta-oe, > and they are needed by meta-filesystems. > > ./recipes-filesystems/ifuse/ifuse_1.1.2.bb:6:DEPENDS = "fuse > libimobiledevice" > ./recipes-filesystems/smbnetfs/smbnetfs_git.bb:6:DEPENDS = "fuse samba" > > >> (layers that depend on meta-oe bother me, especially when they depend on >> just a tiny fraction of it) >> >> Ross
Right, it should be avoided, see for example the case of cramfs needing two extra layers for no particular reason... I'm still of the opinion some should be moved to oe-core, at least the ones involved in image creation. Cheers Andrea >> _______________________________________________ >> Openembedded-devel mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel > > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
