On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 5:04 PM, Joe MacDonald <j...@deserted.net> wrote: > [Re: [oe] [meta-networking][PATCH] openflow: Add latest from git] On 13.09.04 > (Wed 08:22) Bruce Ashfield wrote: > >> On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 11:27 PM, Joe MacDonald <j...@deserted.net> wrote: >> > On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 6:39 PM, Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfi...@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> >> > ... >> >> - We run some tests against meta-virt and give you the thumbs up when it >> >> is safe to merge, and the meta-virt copy can be deleted. I definitely >> >> don't >> >> want two of these running around. >> > >> > I don't mind delaying a merge a bit while waiting for more feedback on >> > testing, provided we're talking about a reasonable timeframe. >> > Otherwise, if the submitted OpenFlow is working well enough in >> > meta-net, I'm inclined to merge it and take patches from you guys if >> > you find issues down the road. That'll be how it will work anyway in >> > three month's time, for example, when meta-virt has dropped their >> > copy. >> > >> > How long do you think you'll need on this? >> >> I can test the new SRCREV and recipe by the end of the day, assuming >> that you have the slightly edited version by the time I'm done, there >> shouldn't be any incurred delay. > > Great, thanks. Let me know how it goes.
My cherry-picked version of the patch looks sane, the newer hash worked ok in my tests. Which isn't surprising, since the number of changes between the old and new SRCREV isn't that big. So from that front, we are fine to keep chugging along. Bruce > > -- > -Joe MacDonald. > :wq -- "Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await thee at its end" _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
