OK, thanks. I am just trying to make sure not to break anything for libnl 3.x.
Here is the old upstream report: https://sourceforge.net/p/net-snmp/bugs/2238/ On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 6:22 PM, Joe MacDonald <[email protected]> wrote: > [Dropped libnl fix for net-snmp: Why?] On 13.09.05 (Thu 16:43) Laszlo Papp > wrote: > > > Hi Joe and co, > > > > what exactly is the reason for this patch having been dropped? > > > > http://patches.openembedded.org/patch/20563/ > > > > This was not so thoughtful decision. The current net-snmp version will > not > > build against denzil, and in fact, this patch should be even upstreamed. > I will > > take care about that one, but is there any objection against me > submitting this > > change for net-snmp in meta-networking? > > Nope, no objection from me. It appears to be reasonable. I think the > only reason it doesn't appear in meta-net today is it was sent against > OE Classic and perhaps never sent for inclusion in meta-openembedded. > That's just a wild guess, though, it looks like the whole thing > may pre-date my involvement with the project. > > -- > -Joe MacDonald. > :wq > _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
