On 13/09/13 16:17, Jack Mitchell wrote:
On 13/09/13 15:56, Koen Kooi wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Op 13-09-13 16:53, Paul Eggleton schreef:
On Friday 13 September 2013 15:23:36 Jack Mitchell wrote:
On 13/09/13 15:18, Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 13-09-13 15:22, Jack Mitchell schreef:
From: Jack Mitchell <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jack Mitchell <[email protected]> ---
Change from v1: added signed-off-by
meta-oe/recipes-support/libsoc/libsoc_0.3.bb | 18
++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+) create mode
100644 meta-oe/recipes-support/libsoc/libsoc_0.3.bb
diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-support/libsoc/libsoc_0.3.bb
b/meta-oe/recipes-support/libsoc/libsoc_0.3.bb new file mode 100644
index 0000000..e91e152 --- /dev/null +++
b/meta-oe/recipes-support/libsoc/libsoc_0.3.bb @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+SUMMARY = "libsoc is a C library for interfacing with common SoC
peripherals through generic kernel interfaces" +HOMEPAGE =
"https://github.com/jackmitch/libsoc"; + +LICENSE = "LGPLv2.1"
+LIC_FILES_CHKSUM =
"file://COPYING;md5=e0bfebea12a718922225ba987b2126a5" + +inherit
autotools + +DEPENDS = "libgcc"
Isn't that automatically implied with gcc-cross?
I wasn't sure, so I thought I would stick it in and see if anyone
piped up, I'll remove it in v3.
Also on that note I noticed that Apache2 also DEPENDS on libgcc, is
that also wrong?
I don't know anything about this particular recipe, but IIRC, apache
complains if libgcc is not installed at runtime, and at least when I
added that to the recipe it was not being installed otherwise.
But that's RDEPENDS, no?
regards,
Koen
My apologies, I just checked and it is as an RDEPENDS. The reason that I
put libgcc in the DEPENDS is that when I was developing libsoc I ran
into a function (pthread_cancel) which required libgcc.so.1 to be on the
rootfs, which it wasn't. Having just checked a new build now, with only
core-image-minimal there doesn't appear to be any libgcc.so.1 in the
rootfs again, so should I have libgcc in RDEPENDS? I thought OE put all
the libraries it linked against in the rootfs automatically... or have I
misunderstood?
Cheers,
Ah-hah, some context:
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.handhelds.openembedded.core/37086
So, based on that it seems as though it was never really resolved and
having just checked eglibc,inc, the line mentioned in the above thread
is still commented.
So, as tackling this eglibc problem is way above my league (I'd probably
hinder more than help!) I'm going to do a v4 with RDEPENDS on libgcc.
I'll search for a bug report, and if there isn't one I'll do my best to
submit a suitably informative one.
Cheers,
--
Jack Mitchell ([email protected])
Embedded Systems Engineer
Cambrideshire, UK
http://www.embed.me.uk
--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
