On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 09:29:50PM +0100, Laszlo Papp wrote: > On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 9:23 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko <de...@denix.org> wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 10:15:36PM +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 03:49:22PM -0400, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > > > > On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 08:43:48PM +0100, Laszlo Papp wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 8:33 PM, Martin Jansa <martin.ja...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 08:57:10PM +0200, Eric Bénard wrote: > > > > > > > Le Mon, 07 Oct 2013 14:37:39 -0400, > > > > > > > Denys Dmytriyenko <de...@denix.org> a écrit : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 08:29:56PM +0200, Eric Bénard wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi Denys, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Le Mon, 07 Oct 2013 14:01:20 -0400, > > > > > > > > > Denys Dmytriyenko <de...@denix.org> a écrit : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin, Otavio, et al, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Are you planning on updating Qt version in master to 5.1.1 > > any > > > > > > time soon, > > > > > > > > > > preferably before 1.5 release? :) If nobody looked into > > that yet, > > > > > > will you be > > > > > > > > > > open to take patches for the same? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have 5.1.1 in test here. I expect to send the patch in the > > coming > > > > > > > > > days. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks! Sounds good. Let me know if you need help in testing! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > as soon as it finish to compile here I'll send the patch serie > > for > > > > > > > testing. > > > > > > > > > > > > +Laszlo > > > > > > > > > > > > Laszlo also said that he is working on patches for 5.1.1 I don't > > know > > > > > > how far he got.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Not any far, sorry, but I would be happy to use someone else's > > patches. By > > > > > the way, it would be nice to have 5.2.0 alpha (and later beta) > > updates > > > > > soon, too. > > > > > > > > Having 5.2.0 alpha would be nice, but that's probably too unstable to > > try and > > > > get in before Dora release. I want 5.1.1 as the latest stable to get > > into > > > > Dora. :) So, I'm offering any help to expedite things like testing and > > such :) > > > > > > I've already branched meta-qt5/dora before removing 5.0.2 recipes from > > > master. > > > > > > I'm willing to "backport" 5.1.1 from master to dora or even remove 5.0.2 > > > there as well, but last time I've asked around nobody responded to say > > > if they are still using 5.0.2 or 5.1.* is good enough for everybody. > > > > Sorry for not responding before, but for our needs 5.0.2 is not sufficient, > > 5.1.x and specifically 5.1.1 is preferred. I would very appreciate > > backporting > > 5.1.1 into Dora > > Be careful with this. I assume you mean the dora branch as opposed to the > Dora poky release.
Not to sound rude and I mean no offense to our Poky friends, but I don't care about Poky release here. I care about the Yocto Project unified tagging and branching strategy, so yes, Dora branch is what I meant. And besides, Poky release does not contain meta-qt5, as far as I know. -- Denys _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
