On Monday, February 24, 2014 12:19:07 PM Paul Eggleton wrote: > On Sunday 23 February 2014 22:26:34 Khem Raj wrote: > > On Feb 23, 2014, at 10:23 PM, Lukas Bulwahn <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > We provide a recipe for python-netifaces in the meta-ros layer as well. In > > > fact, a quick search on the OpenEmbedded Layer Index [1] reveals that > > > meta-ros and meta-openstack both provide a recipe for python-netifaces. > > > With your use case and recipe, we would have now three recipes. So, I > > > suggest to unify all three recipes and come up with the best (complete) > > > recipe from these three versions and add them to the meta-oe layer. We > > > then can remove the duplicate recipes in the application layers. > > > > If these layers have dependency on meta-oe then please add the recipe there > > and remove from other places. > > There has been some discussion about creating a meta-python layer (within the > meta-openembedded repository) for these kinds of recipes. I think the time > has > come to actually do that, before we add any further python recipes to the > general meta-oe layer. Could someone send a patch to create meta-python?
meta-python is good. I always worry about layer being maintained, in fact I have some python 3 extra recipes that I wanted to contribute which dont belong to core.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
