On Feb 27, 2014, at 1:48 AM, Martin Jansa <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 04:07:01PM -0800, Khem Raj wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 3:15 PM, Martin Jansa <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa <[email protected]> >>> --- >>> meta-oe/recipes-support/ode/ode_0.13.bb | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> meta-oe/recipes-support/ode/ode_0.9.bb | 28 ---------------------------- >>> 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) >>> create mode 100644 meta-oe/recipes-support/ode/ode_0.13.bb >>> delete mode 100644 meta-oe/recipes-support/ode/ode_0.9.bb >>> >> >> git format-patch -M please >> >>> diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-support/ode/ode_0.13.bb >>> b/meta-oe/recipes-support/ode/ode_0.13.bb >>> new file mode 100644 >>> index 0000000..8e9eb15 >>> --- /dev/null >>> +++ b/meta-oe/recipes-support/ode/ode_0.13.bb >>> @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ >>> +SUMMARY = "ODE is an Open Source Physics Engine" >>> +SECTION = "libs" >>> +HOMEPAGE = "http://www.ode.org"; >>> +LICENSE = "LGPLv2.1 & BSD" >>> +LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = " \ >>> + file://COPYING;md5=1de906ee96808d9776dd72a5f9a79a22 \ >>> + file://LICENSE.TXT;md5=771782cb6245c7fbbe74bc0ec059beff \ >>> +" >>> +# LICENSE-BSD.TXT is missing in 0.13 tarball, but COPYING still says it's >>> dual licensed >>> +# and svn repo still contains LICENSE-BSD.TXT so maybe it will return in >>> next tarball >> >> can this be added as a patch ? > > Yes, but I don't know the real intentions in upstream, so I would rather > keep it as comment and return it in next release (if they return it as > well). OK fair.
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
