Was working with Martin on this one; the "original" patch referred to is Tim's gnuplot upgrade patch. The patch being superseded is my earlier patch from today that included Tim's changes plus the license change. *And* the license file patch was just resent as a patch to meta-oe, so hopefully we're good on this one...
Steve On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Paul Barker <p...@paulbarker.me.uk> wrote: > On 1 April 2014 23:36, Stephen Arnold <stephen.arnol...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Also sent license file patch for oe-core. This supercedes previous > gnuplot > > patch that incorrectly included the original gnuplot patch changes as > well. > > Just got a few bits of general advice on submitting patches to > OpenEmbedded: > > Each patch subject should be of the form "thing: change", where thing > is usually the recipe name. So this would be "gnuplot: Use gnuplot > license" or something similar. > > The "[PATCH]" tag should be "[PATCH v2]" if you're superseding a > previously sent but not yet merged patch. In this case, it's unclear > which patch your mean. Please email in reply to the patch you want to > cancel so that the maintainers know not to merge it. > > There's a lot of further detailed advice and guidelines at > http://www.openembedded.org/wiki/Commit_Patch_Message_Guidelines > > Thanks, > > -- > Paul Barker > > Email: p...@paulbarker.me.uk > http://www.paulbarker.me.uk > -- > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-devel mailing list > Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel > -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
