On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 4:50 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko <[email protected]> wrote: > Definitely OMAP34xx/35xx family. I'm not very sure if OMAP36xx/37xx had a > fixed BootROM already, but probably it had, as Beagleboard xM was much more > forgiving to SD card format, IIRC... This matches my experience. Unfortunately, we still have a lot of customers using OM35xx parts so I'd better not take the CHS stuff out of our instructions just yet. --Ash -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
- Re: [oe] State of the art for creating ... Philip Balister
- Re: [oe] State of the art for crea... Diego Sueiro
- Re: [oe] State of the art for ... Denys Dmytriyenko
- Re: [oe] State of the art for ... Ash Charles
- Re: [oe] State of the art for ... Philip Balister
- Re: [oe] State of the art for ... Ash Charles
- Re: [oe] State of the art for ... Denys Dmytriyenko
- Re: [oe] State of the art for ... Philip Balister
- Re: [oe] State of the art for ... Denys Dmytriyenko
- Re: [oe] State of the art for ... Denys Dmytriyenko
- Re: [oe] State of the art for ... Ash Charles
- Re: [oe] State of the art for ... Diego Sueiro
- Re: [oe] State of the art for creating an image... Brian Hutchinson
- Re: [oe] State of the art for creating an i... Denys Dmytriyenko
- Re: [oe] State of the art for creating an image that you... Otavio Salvador
