On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 12:56 AM, Gary Thomas <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2014-07-31 16:46, Andrea Adami wrote: >> >> Signed-off-by: Andrea Adami <[email protected]> >> --- >> meta-initramfs/recipes-bsp/kexecboot/kexecboot_0.6.bb | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/meta-initramfs/recipes-bsp/kexecboot/kexecboot_0.6.bb >> b/meta-initramfs/recipes-bsp/kexecboot/kexecboot_0.6.bb >> index d0176c5..1fb5f0d 100644 >> --- a/meta-initramfs/recipes-bsp/kexecboot/kexecboot_0.6.bb >> +++ b/meta-initramfs/recipes-bsp/kexecboot/kexecboot_0.6.bb >> @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ EXTRA_OECONF = "--enable-delay=2 >> --enable-evdev-rate=1000,250" >> >> do_install () { >> install -d ${D}${bindir} >> - install -m 0755 kexecboot ${D}${bindir}/ >> + install -m 0755 kexecboot ${D}${bindir} >> install -d ${D}/proc >> install -d ${D}/mnt >> install -d ${D}/dev >> > > What is the reason for this change. Using XXX/ is quite common > in OE recipes. >
Hi Gary, thanks for reviewing, I recently spotted this slash and imho is just one extra unnecessary char. About the 'best practice' here, the POSIX synopsis seems not describing an ending slash for <target> http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/cp.html Cheers Andrea > -- > ------------------------------------------------------------ > Gary Thomas | Consulting for the > MLB Associates | Embedded world > ------------------------------------------------------------ > -- > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
