On Sat, Dec 6, 2014 at 4:51 AM, Martin Jansa <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 11:15:56PM -0200, Raphael Philipe wrote: >> Hi Martin, >> do you mean to use the -M40 parameter for git format-patch? >> >> I did that, but the produced patch was exacly the same as without it. > > It was supposed to better detect renamed file and sent easier to review > patch, you can experiment a bit more with the number, but don't worry > too much. > >> Please noticed that I deleted libftdi_0.19.bb and created libftdi_1.1.bb. > > Yes that's correct and why I was expecting git to show smaller diff.
You can try -M only or -M95. So you 'force' it to deal it as a rename. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750 -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
