On 03/02/2015 03:56 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 5:49 PM, Philip Balister <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 02/27/2015 04:37 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: >>> On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 5:42 PM, Philip Balister <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> On 02/27/2015 12:31 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: >>>>> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 04:46:48PM -0800, Philip Balister wrote: >>>>>> Please pull these three patches into meta-oe/dizzy. >>>>>> >>>>>> https://github.com/openembedded/meta-oe/pull/19 >>>>>> >>>>>> These lead to a working PyQt4, which will reduce the number of questions >>>>>> I get about gnuradio-companion not working on dizzy. >>>>> >>>>> I'm not sure if we should do upgrades in release branch which should >>>>> receive only bug fixes, but I'll let daisy maintainers to decide. >>>> >>>> Basically, what is in dizzy doesn't work for anyone. To make it work, we >>>> need to upgrade to pickup some changes that made pyqt easier to cross >>>> compile. >>> >>> Yes, this is why I support this update however we need to fix the sip >>> upgrade path. >>> >> >> What's wrong with the sip update path? Originally, there was only a >> recipe for sip-native, this patch replaces the sip-native recipe with >> one that works for native and target. > > Upgrade path. python-sip died no? >
Ah yes. python-sip was built from the sip package. The new sip recipe handles the building and installation of the python bits. How do we tell package manages what happened? (Yes I suck at packaging) In reality, I doubt many people installed python-sip. Philip -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
