Hi Martin, On 05.03.2015 02:26, wenzong fan wrote: > On 03/04/2015 07:02 PM, Andreas Oberritter wrote: >> On 04.03.2015 10:43, wenzong fan wrote: >>> On 03/04/2015 05:12 PM, Andreas Oberritter wrote: >>>> Dear Wenzong Fan, >>>> >>>> On 04.03.2015 07:18, [email protected] wrote: >>>>> From: Wenzong Fan <[email protected]> >>>>> >>>>> The smb, nmb, winbind services have been disabled for systemd system >>>>> by default, disable them for sysvinit as well. >>>> >>>> why would anybody install these services without the desire for using >>>> them? Did the patch disabling them for systemd get merged by mistake? I >>>> remember Paul objecting to it. >>> >>> The samba is not a common service that required by system, especially in >>> some security environment, it should be configured correctly first - >>> This is why I incline to disable it by default. >> >> This doesn't convince me, as the line you're drawing between samba and >> other services seems to be chosen arbitrarily. >> >> "git grep INITSCRIPT_PARAMS.*disable" shows no results in both >> openembedded-core and meta-openembedded (dizzy). So samba will be the >> first and only service that's disabled by default and requires manual >> intervention by the user? Why don't you ship a safe configuration >> instead? >> >> As Paul stated, the distro is responsible for correct configuration. >> IMHO there's no reason to deviate from common behaviour just because >> samba seems to be less safe than any other network service in your view. >> > > Ok, thanks for your advises, I agree with you. > > Please maintainer ignore my patch. > >>> Yes, it did - this may give me some hints that it should be disabled ... >> >> Unfortunately I don't understand what you're referring to here. > > Sorry for the confusion, it answered you second question about if "the > patch disabling them for systemd get merged by mistake?". > > Yes, the patch for systemd has been merged - It gives me hint that it's > a proper behavior for samba, but looks it isn't ... > > Please refer to the commit: 20a624928c030fa13d8b7d45b4f4d7e1ac624f60 > > It should be reverted now!
You applied this patch to jansa/master. Would you mind reverting 20a624928c030fa13d8b7d45b4f4d7e1ac624f60 instead, as discussed in this thread? Regards, Andreas -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
