On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 11:08:43PM -0300, Khem Raj wrote: > > > On Mar 30, 2015, at 6:42 PM, Otavio Salvador <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 10:40 PM, Khem Raj <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> On Mar 30, 2015, at 5:45 PM, Otavio Salvador <[email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>> On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 5:25 PM, Henning Heinold > >>> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> if I remember correctly, than the bdwgc inside cacao differs from > >>>> upstream. > >>> > >> > >> there must be a reason why cacao decided to fork its own copy. Do we know ? > > > > I don't. We could compare the versions and see if it has any change. > > > > we should find the reason before we conclude anything and go one way or other > sometimes differences are very subtle
Looking at commit log [1], I couldn't find anything that explains why there is a fork. I was not able to clone the repository, but browsing the source online I cound only see commits that are upgrades and one that specifically reverts all CACAO modifications [2]. [1] http://mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at/hg/cacao/ [2] http://mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at/hg/cacao/rev/160a7ee3aa30 -- Hugo -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
