Hi Anders, On Monday 27 April 2015 06:53:19 Anders Darander wrote: > * Cristian Iorga <[email protected]> [150424 17:45]: > > bluez4 recipe has been updated with proper systemd > > support, so update meta-systemd append accordingly. > > Also update to the right directory structure. > > > > Signed-off-by: Cristian Iorga <[email protected]> > > --- > > > > .../recipes-connectivity/bluez/bluez4_4.101.bbappend | 5 > > ----- 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-) > > rename meta-systemd/{oe-core => > > meta-oe}/recipes-connectivity/bluez/bluez4_4.101.bbappend (51%) > Like Martin asked on you V2, why do you keep this as a bbappend, instead > of adding this directly to the recipe? > > If you look at meta-systemd today, you'll see that there's only a minor > number of recipes from oe-core, that's being appended. All the other > recipes that previously where appended to from meta-systemd, has got > their systemd support directly in their own recipes.
It depends on what you mean by systemd "support". What's left over in most of the meta-systemd bbappends is RPROVIDES/RREPLACES/RCONFLICTS on the package names which we haven't used for a couple of years by now; surely at some point we should let those die with meta-systemd? Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
