On Apr 29, 2015 10:37 AM, "Carlos Rafael Giani" <[email protected]> wrote: > > The latest one (V8) seems good to me. I was initially skeptical about the heavy chromium.inc refactoring, but these days we don't have multiple chromium versions in meta-browser, so it is okay. > The shared object versioning bandaid wasn't done by me, I modified other parts, but I agree with the patch. The way it is done now is cleaner. > Have you come across a case where there were codec package conflicts? >
Not yet but this makes it future proof. Since I know there are packages with same .so > > > Am 2015-04-27 um 23:40 schrieb Otavio Salvador: >> >> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 6:37 PM, Khem Raj <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Apr 27, 2015, at 1:33 PM, Andre McCurdy <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Looks like some regressions may have crept back relative previous >>>> versions of the patch? >>>> >>>> - dubious indent in do_install() >>>> - .pak files being installed as executables >>>> - dev-so INSANE_SKIP shouldn't be requied >>>> >>> Thanks for bringing it up. I will send a followup to fix it incrementally. >> >> Please wait for Carlos comments and send a new pathc revision. This is >> not yet merged so fixes are still possible. >> > > -- > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
