On 05/21/15 17:18, Khem Raj wrote: >> On May 21, 2015, at 11:26 AM, Trevor Woerner <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> Why would someone include your layer and not build for odroidc1 or >> wetekplay? Sometimes that's what people do ;-) (look at Angstrom, for >> example). Besides, a BSP layer should be able to play nicely with other >> layers even when its machines aren't being used :-) > This is very much desirable, in todays times. In angstrom e.g. we want to > generalize feeds across > many machines for arm especially, so we can share common feeds across > multiple armv7a machines > so BSP maintainers have to start thinking that their BSP layer will be put > along with other BSP layers > and they not change common components mindlessly to fit for just one given > machine. > > secondly more and more end users especially big companies have more than 1 > machine tied into their useless > so its desirable for them to use one distro across all the product lines and > hence a requirement to have > BSP layers play well with each others.
Shouldn't this be true of distro layers as well? Simply included meta-angstrom in conf/bblayers.conf causes one's DISTRO to be set to angstrom, even if they select poky in conf/local.conf. -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
