I agree with #2. Argument that it's still used by many projects shouldn't be used against layers :).
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 1:13 AM, akuster808 <akuster...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 06/22/2015 03:43 AM, Burton, Ross wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> So, Qt 4.8.7 was released last month[1]. Support for Qt4 stops at the >> end of 2015, and 4.8.7 is planned to be the last ever release of Qt4. >> It's still mandated by the long-awaited LSB 5 but I think it's fair to >> say that the majority of developers have moved to Qt5. So, what should >> we do with Qt4 moving forward?[2] I see several options: >> >> 1) There's still lots of people using Qt4 in production, please keep it >> in oe-core! (and revisit in six months time) >> 2) Move Qt4 recipes and classes to a meta-qt4 layer now so that oe-core >> 1.9 ships without Qt4, and anyone wanting full LSB compliance or Qt4 >> will need to add that layer to their distro. >> >> Personally, I vote for (2). Any other comments? >> > > #2 sounds fine. > > would recipes-lsb move out to its own layer too? > > - Armin > >> >> Ross >> >> [1] https://blog.qt.io/blog/2015/05/26/qt-4-8-7-released/ >> [2] https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7812 >> >> >> -- > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > openembedded-c...@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core > -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel