On 2015-07-24 18:37, Khem Raj wrote:
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 8:36 AM, Gary Thomas <[email protected]> wrote:
On 2015-07-21 09:26, Victor Rodriguez wrote:
Hi team
I have a question , according to documentation there is a difference
between
IMAGE_INSTALL_append
and
CORE_IMAGE_EXTRA_INSTALL
Specifies the list of packages to be added to the image. You should
only set this variable in the local.conf configuration file found in
the Build Directory.
When I use the second one and try to build a core-image-minimal-xfce
bitbake does not install what I wanted in my image . I had a really
hard time few weekends ago because of this.
I wonder If I am missing something or if this is a bug
The core-image-minimal-xfce recipe does not "play nice" with
the core-image class and is not respecting CORE_IMAGE_EXTRA_INSTALL.
its not required to.
Maybe it's not required, but since that is the recommended way to
add packages to an image, it probably should. As you can see from
the original question, the non-standard behaviour is confusing,
certainly to new users. It would only take a little reorganization
to make it work as expected.
I think this should be filed as a bug (and feel free to suggest a patch)
No. Its not OE-Core or yocto bug
BTW, this question should really be on the OpenEmbedded development list.
its valid for meta-xfce only.
--
------------------------------------------------------------
Gary Thomas | Consulting for the
MLB Associates | Embedded world
------------------------------------------------------------
--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
