Hi, > > Again, since the LIC_FILES_CHKSUM has changed, it is a courtesy to > > indicate why. As the committer, it is your responsibility to make sure > > the same license still applies. > > A minor correction - it's not just a courtesy, I think we'd consider it > mandatory. We > probably ought to document that somewhere (at the OE level) if we haven't > already.
I got it. I'll re-submit this patch. Cheers Lei > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Paul > Eggleton > Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2015 4:18 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [oe] [meta-python][PATCH v2] python-requests: upgrade > 2.5.1->2.7.0 > > On Tuesday 04 August 2015 21:51:36 Tim Orling wrote: > > . > > > > On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 7:25 PM, Lei Maohui <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Signed-off-by: Lei Maohui <[email protected]> > > > --- > > > > > > .../python/{python-requests_2.5.1.bb => python-requests_2.7.0.bb} > > > | 7 > > > > > > +++---- > > > > > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) rename > > > meta-python/recipes-devtools/python/{python-requests_2.5.1.bb => > > > > > > python-requests_2.7.0.bb} (56%) > > > > > > diff --git > > > a/meta-python/recipes-devtools/python/python-requests_2.5.1.bb > > > b/meta-python/recipes-devtools/python/python-requests_2.7.0.bb > > > similarity index 56% > > > rename from > > > meta-python/recipes-devtools/python/python-requests_2.5.1.bb > > > rename to > > > meta-python/recipes-devtools/python/python-requests_2.7.0.bb > > > index b719dca..1564d50 100644 > > > --- a/meta-python/recipes-devtools/python/python-requests_2.5.1.bb > > > +++ b/meta-python/recipes-devtools/python/python-requests_2.7.0.bb > > > @@ -2,15 +2,14 @@ DESCRIPTION = "Python HTTP for Humans." > > > > > > HOMEPAGE = "http://python-requests.org"; > > > SECTION = "devel/python" > > > LICENSE = "Apache-2.0" > > > > > > -LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = > "file://LICENSE;md5=c7869e52c8275537186de35e3cd5f9ec" > > > +LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = > "file://LICENSE;md5=58c7e163c9f8ee037246da101c6afd1e" > > > > Again, since the LIC_FILES_CHKSUM has changed, it is a courtesy to > > indicate why. As the committer, it is your responsibility to make sure > > the same license still applies. > > A minor correction - it's not just a courtesy, I think we'd consider it > mandatory. We > probably ought to document that somewhere (at the OE level) if we haven't > already. > > Cheers, > Paul > > -- > > Paul Eggleton > Intel Open Source Technology Centre > -- > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
