On 15/09/15 19:00, Khem Raj wrote: > On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 8:03 AM, Trevor Woerner <twoer...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 09/15/15 08:50, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote: >>> * Add also a patch that workarounds a build error when building >>> in Debug mode and using GCC. This patch has no effect when >>> building in Release mode because is guarded within ifdef(debug) >>> blocks. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez <clo...@igalia.com> >>> --- >>> recipes-browser/chromium/chromium.inc | 4 ++- >>> .../fix-build-error-with-GCC-in-Debug-mode.patch | 32 >>> ++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> recipes-browser/chromium/chromium_40.0.2214.91.bb | 1 + >>> 3 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >>> create mode 100644 >>> recipes-browser/chromium/chromium/chromium-40/fix-build-error-with-GCC-in-Debug-mode.patch >> >> Does the above patch need an upstream-status tag? > > Its not must for meta-broweser, but its good since it adds > information. We do not have any automatic tracking of patch status > so if one mentions url for source of patch or any information on where > patch's status can be asserted at later times is good. >
The patch itself includes in the comments at top the URL to the chromium bugtracker where the issue was reported and the patch forwarded.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
