Sorry for the late answer, your replies lands to spam in my gmail box :( yes, the name of the package shall be libtalloc, similar to debian. I have kept the name "talloc" for compatibility reasons. I'd rather apply this or similar patch otherwise "populate sdk" is broken.
does it make sense to add -staticdev to the list and resubmit? 2015-10-06 13:41 GMT+02:00 Jens Rehsack <[email protected]>: > > > Am 03.10.2015 um 20:37 schrieb Christopher Larson <[email protected]>: > > > > On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 11:30 AM, Andrei Kholodnyi < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > >> populate_sdk fails with following message: > >> error: talloc-dev-2.1.1-r0 requires talloc = 2.1.1-r0 > >> > >> these packages are empty,remove them from the package list > >> --- > >> meta-oe/recipes-support/talloc/talloc_2.1.1.bb | 5 +---- > >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-support/talloc/talloc_2.1.1.bb > >> b/meta-oe/recipes-support/talloc/talloc_2.1.1.bb > >> index 89c390f..0c98bb6 100644 > >> --- a/meta-oe/recipes-support/talloc/talloc_2.1.1.bb > >> +++ b/meta-oe/recipes-support/talloc/talloc_2.1.1.bb > >> @@ -20,12 +20,9 @@ EXTRA_OECONF += "--disable-rpath \ > >> --with-libiconv=${STAGING_DIR_HOST}${prefix}\ > >> " > >> > >> -PACKAGES += "libtalloc libtalloc-dbg libtalloc-dev pytalloc > pytalloc-dbg > >> pytalloc-dev" > >> +PACKAGES = "libtalloc libtalloc-dbg libtalloc-dev pytalloc pytalloc-dbg > >> pytalloc-dev" > >> > >> #ALLOW_EMPTY_${PN} = "1" > >> -FILES_${PN} = "" > >> -FILES_${PN}-dev = "" > >> -FILES_${PN}-dbg = "" > >> > > > > Question, why does this use libtalloc as the package names rather than > the > > default of talloc? In the common case of the debian bbclass inherited, > > they'll get renamed based on the library soname anyway. Also, overriding > > the PACKAGES list isn't ideal, since it means future changes to the > default > > value of PACKAGES will not be picked up here. Also, this packaging is > worse > > than default, as it doesn't have the -staticdev package. > > In current situation you have to touch every recipe depending on > talloc - not only in poky and meta-oe, also in any 3rd party layer. > > I agree to the rename, but at a better time (e.g. when jethro has been > settled). > > Cheers > -- > Jens Rehsack - [email protected] > > -- > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel > -- Believe is not enough, you must know -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
