On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 01:09:44PM +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 12:59:37PM +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 08:48:51PM +0200, Jens Rehsack wrote: > > > > > > llvm introduced new JIT technology MCJIT with llvm 3.4 and fixes ARM in > > > 3.5 > > > (see > > > http://llvm.org/releases/3.5.2/docs/ReleaseNotes.html#changes-to-the-arm-backend). > > > > > > Ensure JIT is built with llvm > > > > I'm tempted to leave this one after jethro is branched, unless > > default LLVM_RELEASE is updated in oe-core/jethro mesa as well. > > > > Otherwise everybody will need to set LLVM_RELASE in their mesa bbappend > > or we'll need to bbappend it in meta-oe. > > Or better, update this to keep 3.3 as llvm is meant to allow multiple > versions being built and installed in parallel.
Another reason to keep 3.3 around is build on older hosts, current 3.5 fails in Ubuntu-12.04 | checking whether GCC is new enough... no | configure: error: | The selected GCC C++ compiler is not new enough to build LLVM. Please upgrade | to GCC 4.7. You may pass --disable-compiler-version-checks to configure to | bypass these sanity checks. > > What others think? > > > > And was this tested with mesa or just with java? > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jens Rehsack <[email protected]> > > > --- > > > meta-oe/recipes-core/llvm/llvm.inc | 8 +--- > > > ...r-output-from-configure-if-CFLAGS-is-set-.patch | 52 > > > ---------------------- > > > .../{llvm3.3 => llvm3.5}/arm_fenv_uclibc.patch | 0 > > > .../llvm/{llvm3.3_3.3.bb => llvm3.5_3.5.2.bb} | 11 +++-- > > > 4 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-) > > > delete mode 100644 > > > meta-oe/recipes-core/llvm/llvm3.3/Remove-error-output-from-configure-if-CFLAGS-is-set-.patch > > > rename meta-oe/recipes-core/llvm/{llvm3.3 => > > > llvm3.5}/arm_fenv_uclibc.patch (100%) > > > rename meta-oe/recipes-core/llvm/{llvm3.3_3.3.bb => llvm3.5_3.5.2.bb} > > > (71%) > > > > -- > Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: [email protected] -- Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
