* Ivan Sergio Borgonovo <m...@webthatworks.it> [151022 14:13]: > I think I've been able to find all and only the packages that should be > conditionally added to RDEPENDS in packagegroup-qt5-toolchain-target.bb from > opengl.
> I finally discovered why there was a problem with meta-toolchain-qt5 and > qttools-plugins... qttools-plugins doesn't get build when > -nomake examples > Now I don't understand: > - why nobody noticed this problem that doesn't seem related to opengl or > x11. Was it hidden by something else that I should take care when trying to > fix it? No one is actually baking meta-toolchain-qt5?... Or in my case mostly been staled on an older release... > - what should be considered a correct solution: > * simply remove the package that doesn't really seem that useful in a > toolchain (they should be example plugins for qtcreator) That what work for me. > * conditionally add it just if qt get build with examples [1] Well, this would likely be harder, as one recipe can't access the meta data from another recipe. Though, you could likely get the same effect by moving qttools-plugins from RDEPENDS to RRECOMMENDS. Then it'll be added if it exist, while you won't get any errors if it doesn't exist. Cheers, Anders -- Anders Darander ChargeStorm AB / eStorm AB -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel