On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 10:01 AM, Tim Orling <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 9:45 AM, Phil Blundell <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Thu, 2015-10-29 at 08:42 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: >> >> > I would like to make a proposal for 2.1 release where >> > >> > 1. Drop kconfig support in glibc and we become inline with upstream >> > 2. Move musl support to OE-Core from meta-musl >> > 3. Drop uclibc or leave it in current broken state, I would like to >> > pull it out into a layer in meta-openembedded and we can leave the >> > core plumbing as it is in OE-Core >> > 4. Poky-tiny switches to use musl >> > > In the past we have had issues with iconv support when using musl. Any > experience good or bad with that?
it has got a lot better in locale area off late. I dont know what issues you were facing though. > -- > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
