On 11/13/2015 06:36 PM, Andreas Müller wrote:
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Martin Jansa <[email protected]> wrote:
Why not use VIRTUAL-RUNTIME variable like in other places? And if it's
needed by xfce4-power-manager, then why don't you add it to RDEPENDS there?
networkmanager is already in RDEPENDS of xfce4-power-manager. I think
when building an image packagegroup-core-x11-sato there is a conflict.
I looked into this a bit more and think:
1. networkmanger support is optional so a packagroup would allow
conman and xfce4-power-manager live together in harmony
2. I think the patch goes much to far: To have networkmanager in
images based on packagegroup-core-x11-sato the correct way would be to
write NETWORK_MANAGER = "networkmanager" in the image recipe.
Hi Andreas,
The condition of writing NETWORK_MANAGER = "networkmanager" is
packagegroup-core-x11-sato + xfce4-power-manager, I think it is not
proper to test the existence of them in an image recipe.
Hi Martin & Andreas,
How about we still do the setting in meta-xfce's local.conf and replace
networkmanager with variable ${NETWORK_MANAGER} in
xfce4-power-manager's RDEPENDS.
So we could globally control network manager by variable
${NETWORK_MANAGER} for the similar issue.
//Hongxu
Andreas
--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
