FWIW: there is also: http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/88555/
also still waiting for v3 and I don't know if it was tested with 0.10 gstreamer. On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 11:59 PM, Martin Jansa <[email protected]> wrote: > > Otherwise, why is the patch that seems to have been accepted in 2014 to > fix the 1.0 breaking 0.1 support not been implemented in the layer yet? > > It's incorrectly marked as Accepted in patchwork, but it was never merged > into the repository, because the author never sent v2 with review comments > from me resolved. > > There was another patch: > http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/85075/ > which was merged and nobody was reporting broken 0.10 support since then. > I'm not using 0.10 version, so I was assuming it works now for people who > do. > > Regards, > > > On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 11:24 PM, Gerhard de Clercq < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I've just wasted a lot of time trying to get qtmultimedia to compile on a >> Fido build using the Fido branch of meta-qt5. After a lot of tinkering I >> finally got it working and have found that the problem was caused by the >> 0001-Initial-porting-effort-to-GStreamer-1.0.patch file that ships with the >> layer. I initially didn't realize that the troublesome code was coming from >> it and debugged the cached source (which it seems is patched) until it >> worked. I didn't think it would be so easy but a patch >> http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/79531/ I found from 2014 >> completely told me how to correct the source. >> >> What bothers me is how can this can be possible. Are the recipes designed >> not to apply the patch to non 1.0 build and if so, what could prevent that >> from working? Otherwise, why is the patch that seems to have been accepted >> in 2014 to fix the 1.0 breaking 0.1 support not been implemented in the >> layer yet? >> >> PS. I see the patch file has changed a bit after Fido but unfortunately >> Fido is the latest that my board supports at the moment and I have not been >> able to test with a newer version. >> >> Regards, >> Gerhard de Clercq >> -- >> _______________________________________________ >> Openembedded-devel mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel >> > > -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
