> Am 15.12.2015 um 13:31 schrieb Otavio Salvador > <[email protected]>: > > On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 7:36 AM, Jens Rehsack <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Fix bitbake warnings from variable renaming like >> >> Variable key FILES_${PN} (${bindir}/* ${sbindir}/* ${libexecdir}/* >> ${libdir}/lib*${SOLIBS} ${sysconfdir} ${sharedstatedir} ${localstatedir} >> ${base_bindir}/* ${base_sbindir}/* ${base_libdir}/*${SOLIBS} >> ${base_prefix}/lib/udev/rules.d ${prefix}/lib/udev/rules.d ${datadir}/${BPN} >> ${libdir}/${BPN}/* ${datadir}/pixmaps ${datadir}/applications ${datadir}/idl >> ${datadir}/omf ${datadir}/sounds ${libdir}/bonobo/servers) replaces original >> key FILES_openjre-8 ( ${JRE_HOME}/bin/[a-z]* ${JRE_HOME}/lib/[a-z]* >> ${JRE_HOME}/LICENSE ${JRE_HOME}/release ). >> >> It is caused by using FILES_${PN} and FILES_{JDKPN} or FILES_${JREPN}, >> respectively. Moving FILES_{JDKPN} to openjdk-8_%.bb and FILES_${JREPN} to >> openjre-8_%.bb to allow consequently use FILES_${PN}. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jens Rehsack <[email protected]> > > Looking at the proposed change, it seems it would be better to squash > the JDK and JRE installation to a single recipe and do the proper > split using the packaging. > > Do you think this is reasonable?
I split openjdk-8/openjre-8 because of weird behavior wrt. PREFERRED_PROVIDER_java2-runtime = "openjdk-8-jre" but I think with all the things I learned during packaging openjdk-8 and nqp/perl6 I can retry. This will require lots of tests, so unfortunately it's unlikely to manage it this year - maybe even not before our planned HP1 update release. Cheers -- Jens Rehsack - [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
-- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
