Hi Chris, On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 08:12:30AM +0000, Chris Trobridge wrote: > > > [oe] [PATCH] gpsd: Fix build when static libs disabled > > Chris Trobridge 07:58 > To: [email protected] > > http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/2016-February/106230.html > > > Fix this build error: > > SCons Error: no such option: --disable-static > > Signed-off-by: Maxin B. John <maxin.john at intel.com> > > --- > > meta-oe/recipes-navigation/gpsd/gpsd_3.14.bb | 1 + > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-navigation/gpsd/gpsd_3.14.bb > >b/meta-oe/recipes-navigation/gpsd/gpsd_3.14.bb > > index ff268b3..a300595 100644 > > --- a/meta-oe/recipes-navigation/gpsd/gpsd_3.14.bb > > +++ b/meta-oe/recipes-navigation/gpsd/gpsd_3.14.bb > > @@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ EXTRA_OESCONS = " \ > > systemd='${SYSTEMD_OESCONS}' \ > > ${EXTRA_OECONF} \ > > " > > +DISABLE_STATIC = "" > > & this cannot be used, because then chrpath is not found and only static > >lib is built > > & target=${HOST_SYS} > > > > -- > > 2.4.0 > > While this fixes the build, is it just fixing the symptom? > > I have a patch that copies the fix in: > > http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/2016-February/106251.html > > That is: use EXTRA_CONF_PACKAGECONFIG instead of EXTRA_OECONF, as mentioned > the above diff. > > This prevents the option being pulled in in the first place, which ought to > be a more general solution. >
Once that EXTRA_CONF_PACKAGECONFIG related patch merged in oe-core, please drop my fix and go ahead with this patch. > Regards, > Chris Best Regards, Maxin -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
