On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 08:41:16PM -0700, Christopher Larson wrote: > On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 9:10 AM, Christopher Larson <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > From: Christopher Larson <[email protected]> > > > > Rework how variables are passed in to ensure that more of our flag vars are > > obeyed, make it obey more of our target path vars, and use fewer of its > > hardcoded flags. Also add verbosity to the compile output for debugging. > > > > Without this, errors were seen for us: > > > > | In file included from > > .../lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/5.2.0/include-fixed/64/sgxx-glibc/syslimits.h:7:0, > > | from > > .../lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/5.2.0/include-fixed/64/sgxx-glibc/limits.h:34, > > | from luaconf.h:12, > > | from lua.h:16, > > | from lj_arch.h:9: > > | > > .../lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/5.2.0/include-fixed/64/sgxx-glibc/limits.h:168:61: > > fatal error: limits.h: No such file or directory > > | compilation terminated. > > | Makefile:233: *** Unsupported target architecture. Stop. > > | make[1]: Leaving directory '.../luajit/2.0.4-r0/LuaJIT-2.0.4/src' > > > > Signed-off-by: Christopher Larson <[email protected]> > > > > Were there issues with this one? I noticed the other patches in this series > were applied, but this one wasn't.
I've seen some luajit failures, but haven't confirmed if it was caused/related to this change yet, so I've kept it in master-next for a bit longer until I find time to confirm it. -- Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
