> On Jul 18, 2016, at 3:48 PM, Bruce Ashfield <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 6:18 PM, Phil Blundell <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > On Mon, 2016-07-18 at 23:01 +0100, Burton, Ross wrote: > > > Now that musl is fairly mature I think it's time to take uclibc out to > > pasture, where the pasture is possibly called meta-uclibc. > > I think this is a splendid idea. > > Agreed. > > But do we need a sharpened stake to make sure it doesn't come back ?
I think its just about time. Given the health of uclibc project and maintenance burden we impose on OE-Core, if someone needs to have it beyond 2.1, please step up and we can create a new layer mnta-uclibc and it can be hosted there. but it certainly should go out of OE-Core. > > Bruce > > > p. > > > > -- > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core > <http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core> > > > > -- > "Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await thee at > its end" > -- > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
-- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
