Op 06-09-16 om 09:02 schreef Andreas Müller: > Hi, > > is there a technical reason why we have multiple fftw recipes (fftw / > fftwl / fftwf)?
Yes, at the time of writing there was no easy way to generate the different libraries using one recipe. Worse, the headers conflict, even in the current situation :/ regards, Koen > > or > > before I start: Any complaints/comments if I > > * merge all fftw's into one recipe named fftw splitting in multiple > packages (fftw / fftwl / fftwf / fftwq?) > * replace virtual/fftw by fftw > * make oe-core's alsa-utils fftw PACKAGFCONFIG[fftw] depending in fftw > > Feedback welcome > > Andreas > -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
