On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 10:15 PM, Andreas Müller <[email protected]> wrote: > Use this workaround as long as there is no better (upstream) fix > > Signed-off-by: Andreas Müller <[email protected]> > --- > meta-networking/recipes-connectivity/samba/samba_4.4.5.bb | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/meta-networking/recipes-connectivity/samba/samba_4.4.5.bb > b/meta-networking/recipes-connectivity/samba/samba_4.4.5.bb > index e35d527..3205c5d 100644 > --- a/meta-networking/recipes-connectivity/samba/samba_4.4.5.bb > +++ b/meta-networking/recipes-connectivity/samba/samba_4.4.5.bb > @@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ EXTRA_OECONF += "--enable-fhs \ > " > DISABLE_STATIC = "" > > -LDFLAGS += "-Wl,-z,relro,-z,now" > +LDFLAGS += "-Wl,-z,relro,-z,now ${@bb.utils.contains('DISTRO_FEATURES', > 'ld-is-gold', ' -fuse-ld=bfd ', '', d)}" > > do_install_append() { > if ${@bb.utils.contains('PACKAGECONFIG', 'systemd', 'true', 'false', > d)}; then > -- > 2.5.5 > 1. This did not make it into master but is still in master-next. 2. Jackie Huang has sent a patch only blacklisting on arm [1] => seems only arm has this bug
[1] http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/2016-September/109036.html => I would like to send a patch changing to bfd linker only on arm. Against which branch shall I create this patch? Andreas -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
