On 26-09-16 22:34, Martin Jansa wrote:
2 more issues:
WARNING: phytool-1.0.1-r0 do_populate_lic: Could not copy license file
phytool/1.0.1-r0/git/COPYING to
phytool/1.0.1-r0/license-destdir/phytool/COPYING: [Errno 2] No such
file or directory: 'phytool/1.0.1-r0/git/COPYING'
ERROR: phytool-1.0.1-r0 do_populate_lic: QA Issue: phytool:
LIC_FILES_CHKSUM points to an invalid file:
phytool/1.0.1-r0/git/COPYING [license-checksum]
NOTE: recipe phytool-1.0.1-r0: task do_populate_lic: Succeeded
...
Weird, it didn't barf on that on my system until I cleaned it and started
over. Ah well, I;ll send a v2 which fixes it.
NOTE: recipe phytool-1.0.1-r0: task do_package_qa: Started
ERROR: phytool-1.0.1-r0 do_package_qa: QA Issue: No GNU_HASH in the
elf binary: 'phytool/1.0.1-r0/packages-split/phytool/usr/bin/phytool'
[ldflags]
ERROR: phytool-1.0.1-r0 do_package_qa: QA Issue: No GNU_HASH in the
elf binary: 'phytool/1.0.1-r0/packages-split/phytool/usr/bin/phytool'
[ldflags]
ERROR: phytool-1.0.1-r0 do_package_qa: QA run found fatal errors.
Please consider fixing them.
ERROR: phytool-1.0.1-r0 do_package_qa: Function failed: do_package_qa
I have no clue what that means. I also have no clue what I'm supposed to do
about it. And on my build it was only a warning.
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 9:31 AM, Khem Raj <[email protected]> wrote:
On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 8:01 AM, Mike Looijmans <[email protected]>
wrote:
On 23-09-16 20:33, Khem Raj wrote:
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 5:33 AM, Mike Looijmans <
[email protected]>
wrote:
A nice tool to directly read, write and interpret ethernet PHY data.
Very useful when debugging PHY or MDIO problems, which ethtool does
not do.
Signed-off-by: Mike Looijmans <[email protected]>
---
meta-networking/recipes-support/phytool/phytool.bb | 14
++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 meta-networking/recipes-support/phytool/
phytool.bb
diff --git a/meta-networking/recipes-support/phytool/phytool.bb
b/meta-networking/recipes-support/phytool/phytool.bb
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..9d541b7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/meta-networking/recipes-support/phytool/phytool.bb
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+SUMMARY = "PHY interface tool for Linux"
+LICENSE = "GPLv2"
+LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=94d55d512a9ba36caa9b7df079bae1
9f"
+
+PV = "1.0.1"
+SRCREV = "1a3ea62a218206e9faf3b27fb5d01c85692024c8"
+SRC_URI = "git://github.com/wkz/phytool.git"
+
+S = "${WORKDIR}/git"
+
+do_install() {
+ install -d ${D}${prefix}/bin
perhaps use base_bindir here
The makefile installs to $PREFIX/bin so I deliberately put the same
folder
in the recipe (the makefile doesn't create the directory). If anyone
changes
$bindir the install will fail.
I see the logic, if you dont want to use bitbake variables then perhaps
its
good to add a comment to explain why it was not done
+ oe_runmake 'DESTDIR=${D}' 'PREFIX=${prefix}' install
+}
--
1.9.1
--
Kind regards,
Mike Looijmans
System Expert
TOPIC Products
Materiaalweg 4, NL-5681 RJ Best
Postbus 440, NL-5680 AK Best
Telefoon: +31 (0) 499 33 69 79
E-mail: [email protected]
Website: www.topicproducts.com
Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
--
Mike Looijmans
--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
