On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 4:05 PM, Philip Balister <[email protected]> wrote: > On 10/21/2016 01:08 PM, Khem Raj wrote: >> >>> On Oct 21, 2016, at 5:14 AM, Philip Balister <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> The fftw-dev package RDEPENDS on the fftw package. Let the recipe create an >>> empty one to satisfy this requirement. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Philip Balister <[email protected]> >>> --- >>> meta-oe/recipes-support/fftw/fftw_3.3.4.bb | 2 ++ >>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-support/fftw/fftw_3.3.4.bb >>> b/meta-oe/recipes-support/fftw/fftw_3.3.4.bb >>> index 0faaea1..0bb6cc2 100644 >>> --- a/meta-oe/recipes-support/fftw/fftw_3.3.4.bb >>> +++ b/meta-oe/recipes-support/fftw/fftw_3.3.4.bb >>> @@ -69,4 +69,6 @@ FILES_fftwl-wisdom = "${bindir}/fftwl-wisdom" >>> FILES_fftwf-wisdom = "${bindir}/fftwf-wisdom" >>> FILES_fftw-wisdom-to-conf = "${bindir}/fftw-wisdom-to-conf" >>> >>> +ALLOW_EMPTY_${PN}= “1" >> >> as Martin said >> >> RDEPENDS_${PN}-dev = “” >> >> should be done. > > It also RDEPENDS on libfftw libfftwf and libfftwl. > > Is there a way to remove just one entry in the RDEPENDS line? Need to > think through exactly what is going on. >
uncoupling it like this will be take care of that too. -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
