On 11/16/16 7:02 PM, [email protected] wrote:
> From: Wenzong Fan <[email protected]>
> 
> The opencv 2.4 has been blacklisted, 3.1 should be the default choice
> for both opencv and lib32-opencv.

blacklisting does not change the norms. Is it possible to fix the reason for
blacklisting 2.x

> 
> Signed-off-by: Wenzong Fan <[email protected]>
> ---
>  meta-oe/recipes-support/opencv/opencv_3.1.bb | 2 --
>  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-support/opencv/opencv_3.1.bb 
> b/meta-oe/recipes-support/opencv/opencv_3.1.bb
> index 1bbb965..a212f4f 100644
> --- a/meta-oe/recipes-support/opencv/opencv_3.1.bb
> +++ b/meta-oe/recipes-support/opencv/opencv_3.1.bb
> @@ -8,8 +8,6 @@ LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = 
> "file://LICENSE;md5=0ea90d28b4de883d7af5e6711f14f7bf"
>  ARM_INSTRUCTION_SET_armv4 = "arm"
>  ARM_INSTRUCTION_SET_armv5 = "arm"
>  
> -DEFAULT_PREFERENCE = "-1"
> -
>  DEPENDS = "python-numpy libtool swig swig-native python bzip2 zlib glib-2.0 
> libwebp protobuf protobuf-native"
>  
>  SRCREV_opencv = "92387b1ef8fad15196dd5f7fb4931444a68bc93a"
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel

Reply via email to