On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 6:13 AM, Andreas Müller <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 3:11 PM, Andre McCurdy <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 5:27 AM, Andreas Müller >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 2:09 PM, Andre McCurdy <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Signed-off-by: Andre McCurdy <[email protected]> >>>> --- >>>> meta-oe/recipes-extended/libconfig/libconfig_1.5.bb | 2 ++ >>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-extended/libconfig/libconfig_1.5.bb >>>> b/meta-oe/recipes-extended/libconfig/libconfig_1.5.bb >>>> index fb6e50e..94daa88 100644 >>>> --- a/meta-oe/recipes-extended/libconfig/libconfig_1.5.bb >>>> +++ b/meta-oe/recipes-extended/libconfig/libconfig_1.5.bb >>>> @@ -12,3 +12,5 @@ inherit autotools-brokensep pkgconfig >>>> >>>> SRC_URI[md5sum] = "a939c4990d74e6fc1ee62be05716f633" >>>> SRC_URI[sha256sum] = >>>> "e31daa390d8e4461c8830512fe2e13ba1a3d6a02a2305a02429eec61e68703f6" >>>> + >>>> +BBCLASSEXTEND = "native" >>>> -- >>>> 1.9.1 >>>> >>> Please tell us why libconfig needs native biuld in commit message. >> >> A private recipe in a private meta layer - the names of which are >> probably not very useful or interesting in a meta-oe commit message. > > So why not just an append in that layer?
Because recipe enhancements which may be useful to others should be merged upstream. > Andreas > -- > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
