On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 10:51 AM, Mark Hatle <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 12/21/16 4:26 PM, Christopher Larson wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 2:53 PM, Mark Asselstine <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> This release of apache2 is no longer found in the main downloads area
>>> but has been moved to the 'archives'. We should uprev apache2 but for
>>> now this will at least get the builds working again.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Mark Asselstine <[email protected]>
>>>
>>
>> Wouldn’t it make sense to do a recipe-local addition to MIRRORS to
>> automatically fall back to the apache archive?
>>
>
> That seems wrong to me.  The recipe should point to the proper upstream 
> location
> for the archive.  If the archive moves, then the recipe should be updated to 
> match.
>
> I know you can easily do local workarounds for mirrors and such, but I 
> wouldn't
> consider putting them into a recipe directly as a good approach as it will 
> hide
> problems from people and make it unclear where the official download location 
> is.
>
> --Mark

Agreed. I also think that the concept is a bad one as if our apache2
recipe is so far behind that the upstream has moved it to archived
that things should break just to give us a kick in the pants to get on
top of things and complete and uprev. So rather than mess around to
paper this over I hope my original change can be merged to allow
builds to complete and I will look to getting a review out for an
uprev after the holidays.

MarkA


> --
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
-- 
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel

Reply via email to