[Re: [oe] [meta-networking] [PATCH] opensaf: 5.0.0 -> 5.1.0] On 16.12.21 (Wed 
21:53) Khem Raj wrote:

> 
> > On Dec 21, 2016, at 12:42 AM, Huang Qiyu <[email protected]> 
> > wrote:
> > 
> > 1)Upgrade opensaf from 5.0.0 to 5.1.0.
> > 2)Modify meta_oe_security_flags.inc to fix error:
> >  /
> >  | collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
> >  | Makefile:542: recipe for target 'librda.la' failed
> >  | make[6]: *** [librda.la] Error 1
> >  \
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Huang Qiyu <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > .../recipes-daemons/opensaf/{opensaf_5.0.0.bb => opensaf_5.1.0.bb}    | 4 
> > ++--
> > meta-oe/conf/distro/include/meta_oe_security_flags.inc                | 1 +
> > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > rename meta-networking/recipes-daemons/opensaf/{opensaf_5.0.0.bb => 
> > opensaf_5.1.0.bb} (94%)
> > 
> > diff --git a/meta-networking/recipes-daemons/opensaf/opensaf_5.0.0.bb 
> > b/meta-networking/recipes-daemons/opensaf/opensaf_5.1.0.bb
> > similarity index 94%
> > rename from meta-networking/recipes-daemons/opensaf/opensaf_5.0.0.bb
> > rename to meta-networking/recipes-daemons/opensaf/opensaf_5.1.0.bb
> > index 6ceb225..be903a0 100644
> > --- a/meta-networking/recipes-daemons/opensaf/opensaf_5.0.0.bb
> > +++ b/meta-networking/recipes-daemons/opensaf/opensaf_5.1.0.bb
> > @@ -21,8 +21,8 @@ SRC_URI = 
> > "${SOURCEFORGE_MIRROR}/${BPN}/releases/${BPN}-${PV}.tar.gz \
> >            file://0001-plmcd-error-fix.patch \
> >            "
> > 
> > -SRC_URI[md5sum] = "94cd1a4c0406e6a45bb04c003f8690e7"
> > -SRC_URI[sha256sum] = 
> > "4b4188a0f3d0ed1ed0e3d77de27c45e2c96b437401de08e7df2ed9ecd54bb999"
> > +SRC_URI[md5sum] = "821391311c73bc2f2dc5a7d867f732e0"
> > +SRC_URI[sha256sum] = 
> > "f687c883a0d50517c33cb445d9177a9e2b07f5bb077bcc0235ffc0fc99af5cb6"
> > 
> > inherit autotools useradd systemd pkgconfig
> > 
> > diff --git a/meta-oe/conf/distro/include/meta_oe_security_flags.inc 
> > b/meta-oe/conf/distro/include/meta_oe_security_flags.inc
> > index 815fb16..01ee4d4 100644
> > --- a/meta-oe/conf/distro/include/meta_oe_security_flags.inc
> > +++ b/meta-oe/conf/distro/include/meta_oe_security_flags.inc
> > @@ -25,3 +25,4 @@ SECURITY_CFLAGS_pn-libvdpau = "${SECURITY_NO_PIE_CFLAGS}"
> > #| make[1]: *** [Makefile:675: libluajit.so] Error 1
> > SECURITY_CFLAGS_pn-luajit = "${SECURITY_NO_PIE_CFLAGS}"
> > 
> > +SECURITY_CFLAGS_pn-opensaf = "${SECURITY_NO_PIE_CFLAGS}”
> 
> I was wondering if it would make sense to move tweaking SECURITY_FLAGS
> in the recipe proper for all the exceptions that we manage in the conf
> metadata 

Makes sense to me, having it over in meta_oe_security_flags.inc seems a
little confusing for someone who doesn't know to look there.  If there's
no objection, I'll just tweak this patch appropriately during the merge.

-J.

> 
> > -- 
> > 2.7.4
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Openembedded-devel mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
> 
-- 
-Joe MacDonald.
:wq

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

-- 
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel

Reply via email to