On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 10:29 AM, Andre McCurdy <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 12:58 AM, André Draszik <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Tue, 2017-01-24 at 11:19 -0800, Andre McCurdy wrote: >>> When cross compiling, the word size of the compiler set via HOST_CC >>> must match the word size of the target. That's achieved by appending >>> "-m32" to BUILD_CC_ARCH if the target word size is known to be 32bits. >>> >>> Unfortunately the current list of over-rides (powerpc, x86 and arm) >>> does not cover all cases. Add mips and mipsel to the list too (which >>> is still not enough to cover all targets or corner cases such as x32, >>> but better than before). >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Andre McCurdy <[email protected]> >>> --- >>> meta-oe/recipes-devtools/luajit/luajit_2.0.4.bb | 2 ++ >>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-devtools/luajit/luajit_2.0.4.bb b/meta- >>> oe/recipes-devtools/luajit/luajit_2.0.4.bb >>> index 964dc1d..2049846 100644 >>> --- a/meta-oe/recipes-devtools/luajit/luajit_2.0.4.bb >>> +++ b/meta-oe/recipes-devtools/luajit/luajit_2.0.4.bb >>> @@ -24,6 +24,8 @@ BBCLASSEXTEND = "native" >>> BUILD_CC_ARCH_append_powerpc = ' -m32' >>> BUILD_CC_ARCH_append_x86 = ' -m32' >>> BUILD_CC_ARCH_append_arm = ' -m32' >>> +BUILD_CC_ARCH_append_mips = ' -m32' >>> +BUILD_CC_ARCH_append_mipsel = ' -m32' >> >> I suspect this should be using: >> >> BUILD_CC_ARCH_append_mipsarchn32 = ' -m32' >> BUILD_CC_ARCH_append_mipsarcho32 = ' -m32' > > That wouldn't work so well when backported to krogoth and morty (which > is where I personally need the fix). > > But maybe there's a more generic way to answer the question "is the > target 32bit?" from within a recipe without needing to keep a list of > over-rides up to date?
SITEINFO_BITS seems to do that. >> >> Cheers, >> Andre' >> -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
